THE
AUTHORSHIP OF THE TAO TE CHING
By
John J. Emerson
The author of the Tao Te Ching is the most
elusive of figures. Arthur Waley, and A. C. Graham have both
concluded that none of the identifications proposed in the Chou
literature are convincing or useful.1According to
Graham, Confucius' teacher, the Chou archivist "Lao
Tan" (seen in in Chuang Tzu and elsewhere) was a minor
Confucian sage, an elder and teacher of Confucius, who was later
appropriated by the Taoists to give the prestige of age to their
tradition. In anecdotes in Chuang Tzu, Lao Tan teaches Chuangism;
whenever Lao Tan is quoted elsewhere in the literature, the
quotations are from the present Tao Te Ching. Likewise, whenever
"Lao Tzu" is cited in the literature, he is either Lao
Tan, or else simply the author of the book which has been given
his name -- there is no other, independent tradition. (Graham
also rather summarily dismisses Ssu-ma Ch'ien's Lao Lai Tzu and
Li Erh.)
Three traditions link the Tao Te Ching in some
way to the state of Ch'in. One recounts that Lao Tan made a
"journey to the west" (to Ch'in) and disappeared, after
first dictating his book to Kuan Yin Tzu. Another identifies the
Chou archivist Lao Tan with the Chou Grand Historian Tan , who in
374 B.C. visited Ch'in, predicting its triumph. Finally, it is
said that Lao Tzu's son Tsung, a Wei general, fled to Ch'in in
275 and founded a family there.
In this article, the book sometimes called Lao
Tzu will be called the Tao Te Ching; its author will be referred
to as the author of the Tao Te Ching, leaving questions of
identification open. (The question of plural authorship should
also be regarded as open, but "author or authors" is
too clumsy). "Lao Tzu" and "Lao Tan" will
designate the persons called by those names in the old
literature; the Grand Historian Tan will be so called in order to
distinguish him from Lao Tan (which is written with a different
graph for Tan).
Graham essentially treats all these stories as
myths or propaganda. While I do not think that any of them can be
taken at face value, I think that there may be a germ of truth in
some of these stories. In particular, I think that it is
significant that Lao Tzu's son was said to have come to Ch'in
from the state of Wei.
Wei was one of the important cultural centers of
the time. Notably, Hui Liang Wang, whose dialogue with Mencius
opens that book was King Hui of Wei (Liang being an archaic
honorific designation of that state: Hui ruled 369-318 B.C.).
There is also reason to believe that the present text of Mo Tzu
was put together in Wei, and aspects of the teachings of the
militarist school may also ultimately be traceable to Wei
sources. (See Appendix).
The crucial figure for my argument here is
Chung-shan Prince Mou of Wei (Mou Tzu) -- a shadowy figure in
early Chinese philosophy, denounced in Hsun Tzu but a treated
positively in Chuang Tzu and the Lu Shih Ch'un Ch'iu. In one of
the two passages in Chuang Tzu, Mou Tzu serves as a spokesman for
Chuangism -- exactly as Lao Tan does in other very similiar
passages in that text: in this passage, Mou Tzu explains to the
logician Kung-sun Lung that Chuang Tzu is too vast for quibbling
logicians even to try to comprehend, and Kung-sun Lung runs away,
struck dumb in amazement.2
The second passage, from section classified by
Graham as "Yangist", is more significant:
"Chung-shan Prince Mou said to Chan-tzu: 'My
body is here by the river and the sea, but my heart lingers on by
the city gate-towers of Wei. What's to be done?'
'Give weight to life. See life as heavy and
profit will be light to you.'
'Well though I know it, still I am unable to
conquer myself.'
'If you cannot conquer yourself, let go. Are
there not aversions which are from the daemonic in us? To be
unable to conquer oneself, yet force oneself not to let go, this
is what is called "being wounded twice over". Men who
wound themselves twice over are the sort that never live
long".
Prince Mou was a prince of 10,000 chariots, and
to hide away in the caves of the cliffs was harder for him than
for a commoner. Even though he had not attained the way, we may
say that he had an idea of it.3
Mou Tzu is also denounced in Hsun Tzu's
"Against Twelve Philosophers", which attacks important
thinkers of his time, most of whom (including T'o Hsiao in this
passage) are unknown or relatively obscure today: "There are
those who take advantage of the world of today, adorning and
embellishing evil doctrines and illicit arguments, thereby
disturbing and disordering the empire; evasive and quibbling,
they cause the confused empire to forget the origins of right and
wrong, disorder and order. Letting their nature run free,
comfortable in their licentiousness, living like beasts, unable
to accept the ordering principles of civilization; yet their
advocacy is reasonable enough, and their arguments make enough
sense, to cheat and confuse the ignorant crowd: these men are T'o
Hsiao and Wei Mou."4
Both passages plausibly might be related to the
Tao Te Ching. In both of them, Mou Tzu sounds like a Taoist or
Yangist. Not much more than that can be concluded from Hsun Tzu's
polemic, but his denunciations could easily apply to the Tao Te
Ching, and I think that it is significant that neither Lao Tzu,
Lao Tan or any other possible author of the Tao Te Ching (a text
which must have existed in Hsun Tzu's time, and which he
certainly would have denounced) is mentioned in this chapter of
Hsun Tzu.
In the Chuang Tzu interview with Chan Tzu just
cited, Mou Tzu yearns for the bright lights of the city,
confessing his inability to live happily in reclusion. This
squares with the place of the Tao Te Ching in the Yangist-Taoist
tradition: the Tao Te Ching is clearly a recipe-book for
statesmen, among other things, and represents a definite movement
away from reclusive self-cultivation. But there is another
tantalizing piece of evidence here: the graph for the name Chan
Tzu has the same phonetic as the graph for the Chou Grand
Historian Tan , and the words were anciently tolerably close in
pronunciation: tam and tiam.5
There are several passages in the Tao Te Ching
which are of special interest when the Wei origins of the text
are under consideration. Of all the Chinese states, Wei was the
one most influenced by the non-Chinese Ti people. For several
hundred years, ending in 408 B.C. with their defeat and
annexation by Wei, the non-Chinese Ti people had ravaged
northwest China. Over the years that had become increasingly
Sinified, intermarrying with the Chinese, allying themselves with
Chinese states, and involving themselves in the internal politics
of these states. When they finally surrendered, they joined the
Chinese multi- state system as semi-autonomous feudal
dependencies of Wei. Mou Tzu's Chung Shan was one of these, a Wei
outpost on the other side of Wei's great enemy Chao; the
"Shang Marches" were another, a buffer between between
Wei and its western adversary Ch'in. (The timing of the
annexation of Chung Shan, the location of Chung Shan vis-a-vis
Chao, and the subsequent status of Chung Shan all suggest that
Chung Shan's capitulation was brought about at least as much by
diplomatic as by military means.)6
As in Islam (Ibn Khaldun and the Bedouins) and
Rome (Tacitus and the Germans), the Chinese had a notion of the
"Noble Savage", who was loyal, brave, frugal, honest,
and tough. For the Chinese, these noble savages were the Ti. The
Primitivist chapters in the Tao Te Ching and perhaps also in
Chuang Tzu may have a Ti reference:
"Reduce the size and population of the
state. Ensure that though there are tools ten times or a hundred
times better than those of other men the people will not use them
.... bring it about that the people will return to the use of
knotted rope [for record-keeping, rather than writing]" (Ch.
80.)
"Hence the large state, by taking the lower
position, annexes the small state; and the small state, by taking
the lower position, is annexed" (Ch. 61). "The reason
why the River and the sea are able to the king of the Hundred
valleys is that they are good at humbling themselves before
them."(Ch. 66).7 The latter two passages seem exactly to describe
the Wei policy toward its smaller dependent states.
CONCLUSIONS
I believe that the following is the best answer
yet to the question "Who was the author of the Tao Te
Ching?" I do not believe that there is a better positive
answer: but it still may be that, as yet, we simply have no way
of knowing.
Like Graham, I think that Lao Lai Tzu, Li Erh,
and Lao Tzu's origins in the state of Ch'u should simply be
ignored, and that "Lao Tzu" in the early literature
either means "the author of the Tao Te Ching", or else
Lao Tan. And I also agree with Graham that Lao Tan was a Taoist
fictional character borrowed from an obscure Confucian legend. In
Chuang Tzu's "Inner Chapters", Lao Tan does not meet
with Confucius; the earliest sure date for the stories of Lao
Tan's meeting with Confucius and of his journey to the west is
240 B.C. in the Lü Shih Ch'un Ch'iu: the "Outer
Chapters" of Chuang Tzu probably are not much earlier than
that and might well be later. In any case, Lao Tan's funeral in
the "Inner Chapters" contradicts the story of the
journey to the west.8
I propose, first, that Mou Tzu was the author of
the late strategic layer of the Tao Te Ching, which I have
described in an earlier paper. (It essentialy comprises Chs.
62-81, several "Primitivist" chapters earlier in the
book, and the chapter- endings introduced by the formula
"Therefore the Sage".) The late layer is highly
sophisticated and a little cynical, with affinities to Shen Tao,
Shen Pu-hai, the Primitivists in Chuang Tzu, the "School of
Names", and the militarist text Sun Tzu. Both the content
and the dating of this layer are consistent with what we know
about Mou Tzu, the friend of Kung-sun Lung denounced by Hsun Tzu.
While the late layer unquestionably develops themes present in
the older layers of the Tao Te Ching, it leaves out others, and
it is heavily loaded with sly political devices which are very
rare in the rest of the book.9
Second, the Grand Historian Tan might be
identifiable with Mou Tzu's more reclusive teacher Chan Tzu, and
might be credited with the earlier, less political and more
poetic layers of Lao Tzu. This is riskier, since Chan Tzu's other
appearances are not of any value for our purposes; but in the
existing literature the attachment of anecdotes to sages can be
quite random.10 The advantage of this identification is double:
first, it recognizes the layered nature of the text; and second,
it eliminates some of the chronological difficulties in the
traditional account: Lao Tzu's son Tsung in 275 B.C. need not
have been the son of the Grand Historian Tan (eminent in 374
B.C.), but rather the son of Mou Tzu.
On this account, Lao Tan's journey to the west
and his description as a Chou archivist are simply backward
contaminations from the true stories of the Grand Historian Tan
and of Mou Tzu's son Tsung. As Graham has pointed out, under the
Han the Taoists needed to minimize their connections with Ch'in,
and Lao Tan was pressed into service for that purpose. Thus, when
Hsun Tzu attacked Mou Tzu, either he was attacking an
independently-circulating version of the works of Mou Tzu alone
(later incorporated into the Tao Te Ching), or else he was
attacking something like the present text of the Tao Te Ching,
which at that time was circulating under Mou Tzu's name.
The identification of the author of the Tao Te
Ching as an archivist or historian seems particularly apropos;
when Graham suggested that Lao Tzu must have been a
"carefree fisherman by the river" rather than an
"dry-as-dust" archivist.11 I think he
was wide of the mark. First of all, while fishermen, woodgathers,
and the like are an important trope in the Taoist pastoral
literature, there is no reason to believe that any of the Taoist
sages really were obscure nobodies. Archivists, especially the
archivist from the rump state of Chou, were powerless but
relatively safe members of the elite, and one can easily imagine
a Yangist or Taoist accepting such a position. Furthermore,
archivists were the custodians of secrets: whatever the ruling
myth of any given dynasty, its archivist possesses the
information required either to support or deflate that myth. The
irony about history characteristic of the Tao Te Ching is what
one might expect from an archivist (or Grand Historian) keenly
aware of the inaccuracies in whichever pious official story was
being promulgated at any given moment.
It cannot be said that Wei's sponsorship of
philosophy did it much good. While Wei did survive until 225
B.C.,12 successive military defeats in 341 B.C., 328
B.C. and 296 B.C. destroyed its power. When Mencius arrived in
322 B. C., Wei was probably already doomed -- and the Tao Te
Ching didn't seem to have helped much either. Whatever its
long-term benefits for the greater world, Wei's turn to
philosophy was to no avail.
APPENDIX: WEI AND PHILOSOPHY
The following two speculations about the
significance of Wei for classical Chinese philosophy are worth
presenting, though they do not fit into the flow of my argument.
Both especially center on the state of Chung Shan and the Ti
influence in northwest China.
Prusek has pointed out that in the third chapter
of Mo Tzu, "On Dyeing" ("So Jan"), that of
the six names on the last of the four lists of rulers whose fate
was linked to their ministers' good or bad advice, four or five
had some connection with the state of Chung Shan or with the Ti
people. The list includes the last ruler of Chung Shan (conquered
in 296 B.C.); the last ruler of Sung (destroyed in 284 B.C.); two
Chin nobles who had both fought against, and allied themselves
with, the Ti people (both of them killed with their families in a
power struggle in 490 B.C.); and finally the Chin ruler who was
defeated by his Han, Wei, and Chao vassals in 453 B.C.,
effectively ending Chin's supremacy -- a man who only four years
earlier had conducted a major campaign against the Ti.13
Of these five, only the defeated ruler of Chin
was really prominent in Chinese history, and it is reasonable to
conclude that this chapter was produced in the former Chin
cultural area, very likely in Chung Shan or Wei. (It also may
have originated in Han, Chao, or even Ch'in; but Wei's cultural
committment was greater than that of these other states, and the
final destruction of Chung Shan would have a different pathos for
Wei than for the other states).
The chapter "On Dyeing" ("So
Jan") is almost identical to the chapter "Tang
Jan" in the Lu Shih Ch'un Ch'iu, (datable to 240 B.C.)
Interestingly, it is at the end of this latter chapter that we
find tacked on the earliest datable reference to Lao Tan's
meeting with Confucius (as mentioned above).14
It is generally agreed that the first seven chapters of Mo Tzu
are late. The first three chapters are especially eclectic:
"The reason that these men became famous and successful is
that they were able to endure shame and humiliation" and
"The big rivers do not despise the little brooklets for
tributaries" (Ch. 1.) These lines, which hardly sound
Mohist, are extremely close to the passages from Chs. 61 and 66
the Tao Te Ching cited above. This chapter also concludes with
some remarks about an unsuccessful "Chief of a Thousand
Chariots": that would be a small state, and Chung Shan and
Sung were the last of the small states to be destroyed.
Reliance on good advisers and good ministers is
one of the most prominent themes in these seven late chapters of
Mo Tzu. The canonical chapters of Mo Tzu often appear in two or
three slightly different versions, and A.C. Graham has classified
these various versions into three groups (not all three of which
are found for any given chapter): a purist or fundamentalist
anti-feudal version, a more accomodationist version seemingly
intended to be argued before an existing ruler, and finally a
Ch'u version which made special concessions to the especially
aristocratic culture of that state.15
Arguably, the first seven chapters of the present
version of Mo Tzu was produced for a Wei audience which had
recent memories of the destruction of Chung Shan; the author
would certainly have been an advocate of the accomodationist
version of the text, though there is no reason to believe that
that version was itself produced at this time.
A second possible Wei influence is on the
Militarist school. Mark Edward Lewis has argued that the kind of
"samurai" loyalty- to-the-death characteristic of the
Chinese military caste originated in the northwest border wars,
very possibly under Ti influence.16 This kind of
loyalty was an innovation, replacing ascribed loyalty to a clan
and a state with a sworn absolute personal loyalty to an
individual military leader. While this kind of loyalty is a
factor in the histories and is referred to in the works of the
philosophers, for the philosophers it is a pre-existing
principle: the Confucians and Yangists especially, do not
advocate or defend it. Wei seems to have been the state within
which Ti influence was strongest, so that if this principle was
in fact learned from the Ti, as Lewis suggests, transmission may
have been through Wei.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Chan, Wing-tsit, Chung kuo Che-hsueh Tz'u-tian
Ta-chuan, Shui-niu Publishing, Taipei, 1983.
Chan, Wing-tsit, The Way of Lao Tzu,
Library of Liberal Arts, 1963.
Chuang Tzu: The Inner Chapters, tr.
Graham, A.C., Allen and Unwin, 1981.
Chuang Tzu Chi Shih, Kuo-chia Publishing,
Taipei.
Emerson, John, "A Stratification of Lao
Tzu", Journal of Chinese Religions, Fall 1995 (#3),
pp. 1-27.
Gernet, Jacques, A History of Chinese
Civilization, Cambridge, 1972.
Graham, A.C., Studies in Chinese Philosophy
and Philosophical Literature, Inst. E. Asian Philosophies,
Singapore, 1986.
Graham, A.C., Divisions in Early Mohism
Reflected in the Core Chapters of Mo-tzu, Inst. E. Asian
Philosophies, Singapore, 1985.
Hermann, Albert, An Historical Atlas of China,
Aldine, 1966.
Hsun Tzu, ed. Wang Chung-lin, San Min
Publishing, Taipei, 1974.
Karlgren, Grammata Serica Recensa, BMFEA
Bulletin #29, Stockholm, 1957.
Lau, D.C., tr., Tao Te Ching, 1982,
Chinese U. Press, Hong Kong.
Lewis, Mark Edward, Sanctioned Violence in
Early China, SUNY, 1990.
Li Xue-qin, Eastern Chou and Ch'in
Civilization, Yale 1985.
Lü Shih Ch'un Ch'iu, Yi-wen Publishing,
Taipei, 1974.
Mencius, The Works of Mencius, tr. Legge, Dover, 1970.
Mo Tzu, The Works of Mo Tzu, tr. Mei,
Confucius Pub. Co., Taipei, 1976.
Tao Te Ching, tr. Lau, D. C., Chinese U.
Press, Hong Kong, 1982.
Prusek, Jaroslav, Chinese Statelets and the
Northern Barbarians in the period 1300--300 B.C., Humanities
Press, 1971.
Waley, Arthur, The Way and its Power,
Grove, 1958.
1 Waley, pp.
101-108; Graham, 1986, pp. 111-125, "Origins of the Legend
of Lao Tan"; see also Chan, 1963, pp. 35-59. My argument is
primarily based on Graham.
2 Chuang Tzu,
Graham tr. p. 154; see Prusek, pp. 196, 200-1.
3 Chuang Tzu,
Graham tr., p. 229; Lü Shih Ch'un Ch'iu, Book XXI,
"Ch'a Wei".
4 Hsun Tzu, pp.
105, 110; my translation. Besides the aforementioned T'o Hsiao,
the only unidentifiable names in this chapter of Hsun Tzu are
Ch'en Chung and Shih Ch'iao, who seem to be primitivist members
of the "Nung-chia" rather than Taoists -- though this
sect may indeed have had an influence on Taoism: Graham, 1986,
pp. 67-110: "The Nung-Chia 'School of the Tillers' and the
Origins of Peasant Utopianism in China".
5 Karlgren,
1957, p. 165; Chuang Tzu Chi Shih, p. 979; Lü Shih Ch'un
Ch'iu, Book XXI, "Ch'a Wei" chapter. The name
"Tan" is written with the "man" classifier
(#9); in the LSCC story the phonetic "Chan" appears
without a classifier; in Chuang Tzu it is written with the
"eye" classifier (#109) and pronounced
"Chan".
6 What I say
about Wei, Chin, and Chung Shan history is derived almost
entirely from Prusek, especially pp. 150-206.
The relationships between Wei and its neighbors
and dependencies can be seen on the map on p. 8 of Herman, 1966;
the "Shang Marches" are the area west of the Huang Ho
bordering on Ch'in. Note that Han, like Wei, controls
non-adjacent dependencies.
7 All citations
from the Tao Te Ching are from Lau's translation.
8 Lao Tan's
funeral: Chuang Tzu, Graham tr., p. 65. Confucius' meeting with
Lao Tan: Lü Shih Ch'un Ch'iu, Book II, "Tang
Jan". Most of this chapter is identical with the Mo Tzu
chapter "So Jan", which probably originated in Wei; the
Lao Tan -Confucius story is tacked onto the end. See Appendix.
9 Emerson, 1995.
For the purposes of the present paper, the "early" and
"middle" layers proposed in 1995 are merged and called
"early"; the "late layer" stays the same.
10
Chan Tzu appears a a prognosticator in Han Fei Tzu's "Chieh
Lao" chapter, and is referred to as a master-fisherman in
Huai Nan Tzu's "Yuan Tao" and "Lan Ming"
chapters.
11
Gernet, p. 103.
12
Graham, 1986, p. 116
13
Prusek pp. 195-6, 201, 205; Mo Tzu, Ch. 3, pp. 20-21.
14
"Tang Jan", Lü Shih Ch'un Ch'iu, Book II, p. 57
15
Graham, 1985
16 Lewis, pp 75-80; p. 279 n. 103.