|
Aristotle
and Mollusc Sex
|
So protracted was [Darwin's]
barnacle study that his children assumed it was the normal
occupation of every father: When one of Darwin's young sons visits a
neighbor's home, he asks his friend there, "Where does your father
work on his barnacles?"
Link |
Aristotle usually figures in cultural history and in
the history of science as a rationalist philosophizer, one of the men who
put The West on the non-empirical, non-experimental, unscientific track of
logical abstraction and argument -- someone whose influence had to be
thrown off before science would be possible.
This picture is really quite misleading. Aristotle
was criticized in his own time for undignified activities such as the
dissection of hermit crabs, and his biological writings show us that as an
experimentalist he wasn't as far removed from Darwin as people think.
To make my point, I've excerpted Aristotle's
writings on the sex lives of the mollusks -- since you can hardly imagine
a less-dignified area of empirical study. After these passages I quote
Aristotle's more general justification of his study of ignoble things --
things "accessible to knowledge" even though not "excellent beyond compare
and divine".
Reading Aristotle here, it's hard not to conclude
that some extraneous influence interrupted the development of Western
science after Aristotle's death, postponing its fruition for almost 2000
years -- maybe the Christians, or maybe the practically- and
ethically-oriented Hellenistic philosophers. (Among the ancients, even
Plato has Parmenides point out that the Forms are to be found even in
ignoble things like mud and hair -- though he did not go as far as Chuang
Tzu and say "piss and shit".)
Aristotle and the Sex Lives
of Molluscs
Part 6
Mollusks, such as the octopus, the sepia, and the calamary, have
sexual intercourse all in the same way; that is to say, they unite
at the mouth, by an interlacing of their tentacles. When, then, the
octopus rests its so-called head against the ground and spreads
abroad its tentacles, the other sex fits into the outspreading of
these tentacles, and the two sexes then bring their suckers into
mutual connexion.
Some assert that the male has a kind of penis in one of his
tentacles, the one in which are the largest suckers; and they
further assert that the organ is tendinous in character, growing
attached right up to the middle of the tentacle, and that the latter
enables it to enter the nostril or funnel of the female.
Now cuttle-fish and calamaries swim about closely intertwined, with
mouths and tentacles facing one another and fitting closely
together, and swim thus in opposite directions; and they fit their
so-called nostrils into one another, and the one sex swims backwards
and the other frontwards during the operation. And the female lays
its spawn by the so-called 'blow-hole'; and, by the way, some
declare that it is at this organ that the coition really takes
place.Part 12
The mollusks also breed in spring. Of the marine mollusks one of the
first to breed is the sepia. It spawns at all times of the day and
its period of gestation is fifteen days. After the female has laid
her eggs, the male comes and discharges the milt over the eggs, and
the eggs thereupon harden. And the two sexes of this animal go about
in pairs, side by side; and the male is more mottled and more black
on the back than the female.
The octopus pairs in winter and breeds in spring, lying hidden for
about two months. Its spawn is shaped like a vine-tendril, and
resembles the fruit of the white poplar; the creature is
extraordinarily prolific, for the number of individuals that come
from the spawn is something incalculable. The male differs from the
female in the fact that its head is longer, and that the organ
called by the fishermen its penis, in the tentacle, is white. The
female, after laying her eggs, broods over them, and in consequence
gets out of condition, by reason of not going in quest of food
during the hatching period.
The purple murex breeds about springtime, and the ceria at the close
of the winter. And, as a general rule, the testaceans are found to
be furnished with their so-called eggs in spring-time and in autumn,
with the exception of the edible urchin; for this animal has the
so-called eggs in most abundance in these seasons, but at no season
is unfurnished with them; and it is furnished with them in especial
abundance in warm weather or when a full moon is in the sky. Only,
by the way, these remarks do not apply to the sea-urchin found in
the Pyrrhaean Straits, for this urchin is at its best for table
purposes in the winter; and these urchins are small but full of
eggs.
Snails are found by observations to become in all cases impregnated
about the same season.
Part 18
Mollusks, after pairing and copulation, lay a white spawn; and this
spawn, as in the case of the testacean, gets granular in time. The
octopus discharges into its hole, or into a potsherd or into any
similar cavity, a structure resembling the tendrils of a young vine
or the fruit of the white poplar, as has been previously observed.
The eggs, when the female has laid them, are clustered round the
sides of the hole. They are so numerous that, if they be removed
they suffice to fill a vessel much larger than the animal's body in
which they were contained. Some fifty days later, the eggs burst and
the little polypuses creep out, like little spiders, in great
numbers; the characteristic form of their limbs is not yet to be
discerned in detail, but their general outline is clear enough. And,
by the way, they are so small and helpless that the greater number
perish; it is a fact that they have been seen so extremely minute as
to be absolutely without organization, but nevertheless when touched
they moved. The eggs of the sepia look like big black
myrtle-berries, and they are linked all together like a bunch of
grapes, clustered round a centre, and are not easily sundered from
one another: for the male exudes over them some moist glairy stuff,
which constitutes the sticky gum. These eggs increase in size; and
they are white at the outset, but black and larger after the
sprinkling of the male seminal fluid.
When it has come into being the young sepia is first distinctly
formed inside out of the white substance, and when the egg bursts it
comes out. The inner part is formed as soon as the female lays the
egg, something like a hail-stone; and out of this substance the
young sepia grows by a head-attachment, just as young birds grow by
a belly-attachment. What is the exact nature of the navel-attachment
has not yet been observed, except that as the young sepia grows the
white substance grows less and less in size, and at length, as
happens with the yolk in the case of birds, the white substance in
the case of the young sepia disappears. In the case of the young
sepia, as in the case of the young of most animals, the eyes at
first seem very large. To illustrate this by way of a figure, let A
represent the ovum, B and C the eyes, and D the sepidium, or body of
the little sepia. (See diagram.)
The female sepia goes pregnant in the spring-time, and lays its eggs
after fifteen days of gestation; after the eggs are laid there comes
in another fifteen days something like a bunch of grapes, and at the
bursting of these the young sepiae issue forth. But if, when the
young ones are fully formed, you sever the outer covering a moment
too soon, the young creatures eject excrement, and their color
changes from white to red in their alarm.
Crustaceans, then, hatch their eggs by brooding over them as they
carry them about beneath their bodies; but the octopus, the sepia,
and the like hatch their eggs without stirring from the spot where
they may have laid them, and this statement is particularly
applicable to the sepia; in fact, the nest of the female sepia is
often seen exposed to view close in to shore. The female octopus at
times sits brooding over her eggs, and at other times squats in
front of her hole, stretching out her tentacles on guard.
The sepia lays her spawn near to land in the neighborhood of
sea-weed or reeds or any off-sweepings such as brushwood, twigs, or
stones; and fishermen place heaps of faggots here and there on
purpose, and on to such heaps the female deposits a long continuous
roe in shape like a vine tendril. It lays or spurts out the spawn
with an effort, as though there were difficulty in the process. The
female calamary spawns at sea; and it emits the spawn, as does the
sepia, in the mass.
The calamary and the cuttle-fish are short-lived, as, with few
exceptions, they never see the year out; and the same statement is
applicable to the octopus.
From one single egg comes one single sepia; and this is likewise
true of the young calamary.
The male calamary differs from the female; for if its gill-region be
dilated and examined there are found two red formations resembling
breasts, with which the male is unprovided. In the sepia, apart from
this distinction in the sexes, the male, as has been stated, is more
mottled than the female.
Link |
Aristotle justifies biology
and other forms of empirical study
Of things constituted by nature some are
ungenerated, imperishable, and eternal, while others are subject to
generation and decay. The former are excellent beyond compare and
divine, but less accessible to knowledge. The evidence that might
throw light on them, and on the problems which we long to solve
respecting them, is furnished but scantily by sensation; whereas
respecting perishable plants and animals we have abundant
information, living as we do in their midst, and ample data may be
collected concerning all their various kinds, if only we are willing
to take sufficient pains. Both departments, however, have their
special charm. The scanty conceptions to which we can attain of
celestial things give us, from their excellence, more pleasure than
all our knowledge of the world in which we live; just as a half
glimpse of persons that we love is more delightful than a leisurely
view of other things, whatever their number and dimensions. On the
other hand, in certitude and in completeness our knowledge of
terrestrial things has the advantage. Moreover, their greater
nearness and affinity to us balances somewhat the loftier interest
of the heavenly things that are the objects of the higher
philosophy. Having already treated of the celestial world, as far as
our conjectures could reach, we proceed to treat of animals, without
omitting, to the best of our ability, any member of the kingdom,
however ignoble. For if some have no graces to charm the sense, yet
even these, by disclosing to intellectual perception the artistic
spirit that designed them, give immense pleasure to all who can
trace links of causation, and are inclined to philosophy. Indeed, it
would be strange if mimic representations of them were attractive,
because they disclose the mimetic skill of the painter or sculptor,
and the original realities themselves were not more interesting, to
all at any rate who have eyes to discern the reasons that determined
their formation. We therefore must not recoil with childish aversion
from the examination of the humbler animals. Every realm of nature
is marvellous: and as Heraclitus, when the strangers who came to
visit him found him warming himself at the furnace in the kitchen
and hesitated to go in, reported to have bidden them not to be
afraid to enter, as even in that kitchen divinities were present, so
we should venture on the study of every kind of animal without
distaste; for each and all will reveal to us something natural and
something beautiful. Absence of haphazard and conduciveness of
everything to an end are to be found in Nature's works in the
highest degree, and the resultant end of her generations and
combinations is a form of the beautiful.
If any person thinks the examination of the rest of the animal
kingdom an unworthy task, he must hold in like disesteem the study
of man. For no one can look at the primordia of the human
frame-blood, flesh, bones, vessels, and the like-without much
repugnance. Moreover, when any one of the parts or structures, be it
which it may, is under discussion, it must not be supposed that it
is its material composition to which attention is being directed or
which is the object of the discussion, but the relation of such part
to the total form. Similarly, the true object of architecture is not
bricks, mortar, or timber, but the house; and so the principal
object of natural philosophy is not the material elements, but their
composition, and the totality of the form, independently of which
they have no existence.
Link |
|
Pharyngula: Squid
P0rn, Part I
Part II
The
sex life of the squid, according to me
The sex life of the squid, various sources
Aristotle, History of Animals, Book V (text cited here)
A more
complete text of Aristotle, History of Animals. Book V
Aristotle dissected hermit crabs
Aristotle's biological texts, index page
I am emersonj at gmail dot com.
Original materials copyright John J
Emerson
Return to
Idiocentrism
jjmrsnx |